SGGW

Polska Bibliografia Naukowa

Index Copernicus Journal Master List

AGRO

Issue 13 (3) 2014 pp. 51–59

Paweł Sałapa, Jacek Jaworski

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF STEEL DOMES

Keywords: steel domes, ribbed dome, Schwedler dome, lamella dome
Abstract: Different designs of parabolic steel domes (ribbed dome, Schwedler dome, lamella dome) with the diameter D = 46 m and the height H = 8 m are compared in this paper. Rigidly – joined and pin – connected systems were used. Dead loads, wind loads and snow loads were included. Rods sections were chosen using results of the computation in the program Robot and considering ULS and SLS conditions. It was found that in most cases the mass of a construction was determined by permissible deformation (critical value of the vertical deformation was set as D/300 and of the horizontal deformation as H/150). The Schwedler dome shoved the smallest mass. The trimmed lamella dome demanded less mass than the lamella dome without rings. The increase of the number of supports in the rigidly – joined ribbed dome decreased slightly the construction mass.
pub/13_3_51.pdf Full text available in Adobe Acrobat format:
http://www.architectura.actapol.net/volume13/issue3/13_3_51.pdf

For citation:

MLA Sałapa, Paweł, and Jacek Jaworski. "COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF STEEL DOMES." Acta Sci.Pol. Architectura 13.3 (2014): 51–59.
APA Sałapa P. and Jaworski J. (2014). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF STEEL DOMES. Acta Sci.Pol. Architectura, 13 (3), 51–59
ISO 690 Sałapa, Paweł, Jaworski, Jacek. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF STEEL DOMES. Acta Sci.Pol. Architectura, 2014, 13.3: 51–59.
EndNote BibTeX RefMan
Streszczenie w języku polskim:
http://www.architectura.actapol.net/tom13/zeszyt3/abstrakt-51.html